Empresas con campañas de marketing controvertidas

Explore the most controversial marketing campaigns that have sparked public debate and intense reactions. From adverts that crossed the line to strategies that challenged social norms, this list examines how companies have used controversy to capture attention. Discover the most notorious cases of advertising that provoked outrage or admiration, and analyse the impact of these decisions on brand reputation. A deep dive into the fine line between creative audacity and miscalculation in the world of advertising.

0100% verified
  1. 1

    Pepsi: Live for Now (2017)

    0 Global Votes

    This Pepsi campaign generated massive controversy in 2017 for trivializing social protest movements and co-opting activism for commercial gain. The ad was swiftly pulled due to widespread condemnation for its tone-deafness and unrealistic portrayal of social causes.

  2. 2

    Nike: Just Do It (2018) with Colin Kaepernick

    0 Global Votes

    This Nike campaign is included for its bold decision to partner with Colin Kaepernick, a polarizing athlete, which generated intense public debate and divided opinions. The marketing strategy, though controversial, resulted in increased media attention and ultimately boosted sales for the brand.

  3. 3

    Gillette: We Believe (2019)

    0 Global Votes
    • Tackles social issues in a smart way

      (+1)

    This Gillette campaign is included due to its intrinsically controversial nature, directly addressing toxic masculinity and the #MeToo movement, which generated massive public polarization. The advertisement sparked a global debate about the role of brands in social issues, resulting in one of the most intense and divided reactions in recent advertising history.

  4. 4

    Balenciaga (2022) Christmas Campaign

    0 Global Votes

    This Balenciaga campaign became a case study in crisis management due to the public outrage it generated. Images of children with teddy bears in bondage gear were widely criticized, leading the brand to issue an apology and face significant reputational damage.

  5. 5

    Burger King 'Moldy Whopper' Campaign

    0 Global Votes
    • Disruptive advertising

      (+3)

    This campaign stands out for its radical approach of showcasing a decomposing Whopper to emphasize the absence of artificial preservatives in its products. Its direct and visually impactful message broke traditional advertising norms, generating a global conversation about transparency in the food industry. The campaign's audacity makes it a notable example of marketing that deliberately seeks controversy to communicate a brand value.

  6. All the rankings you can imagine

    Thousands of verified votes to discover the best. Your vote here counts

  7. 6

    CeraVe x Michael Cera Super Bowl Commercial

    0 Global Votes
    • Masterfully leveraged the "imposter character" concept

      (+4)

    This marketing campaign stood out for its unconventional approach and pre-Super Bowl intrigue strategy, generating organic debate about Michael Cera's supposed involvement with the brand. Its success was built on a bold execution that defied traditional advertising expectations, culminating in a humorous reveal that captured public and media attention.

  8. 7

    Marc Jacobs 'Oh, Lola!' Campaign (2011) with Dakota Fanning

    0 Global Votes

    This Marc Jacobs campaign for its 'Oh, Lola!' perfume is included due to the significant controversy it generated, leading to its ban in the UK. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) deemed it offensive and irresponsible for sexualizing the then-underage Dakota Fanning, highlighting her pose and the placement of the perfume bottle.

  9. 8

    Bacardi (Canada) Banned Ad

    0 Global Votes

    This Bacardi campaign in Canada was banned by the Advertising Standards Authority for implying sexual success and encouraging excessive alcohol consumption. The controversy also stemmed from the objectification of women in alcohol advertising, making it a notable example of controversial marketing.

  10. 9

    Snapple (2005) Giant Popsicle

    0 Global Votes

    This marketing campaign stands out as a prime example of how an ambitious idea can lead to a public relations disaster. Snapple's attempt to create the world's largest popsicle resulted in a massive meltdown that flooded Union Square, generating widespread controversy and ridicule. The campaign is remembered for its failed execution and the negative impact it had on the brand's image at the time.

Frequently asked questions

This ranking evaluates marketing campaigns that have generated significant controversy due to their content, execution, or cultural impact, often eliciting negative reactions or changing the perception of advertising.
Companies are selected based on the notoriety and impact of their advertising campaigns that have been widely considered offensive, tasteless, harmful, or that have sparked considerable public debate.
The results of this ranking should be interpreted as a reflection on campaigns that have challenged social and advertising norms, and the lessons learned from their successes or failures in managing controversy.
Yes, users can suggest campaigns they deem controversial and that meet the criteria of having generated significant public debate or negative reactions.

How we built this ranking and what to consider when choosing

This ranking is compiled from an analysis of marketing campaigns widely recognized for generating controversy, whether due to their content, the context in which they were launched, or public reaction. It is not based on a scientific algorithm, but on the cultural resonance and media impact of each campaign.

  • Campaigns that have been subject to intense public scrutiny and debate in media and social platforms are identified.
  • Consideration is given to campaigns that have elicited a significant negative response from audiences, interest groups, or regulators.
  • The long-term impact of the controversy on brand reputation and the broader advertising industry is evaluated.
  • Selection is based on documented examples of campaigns that have been cited as instances of failed or risky marketing.
  • The campaign must have generated significant public controversy, with media coverage and social debate.
  • The campaign's content must have been perceived as offensive, tasteless, insensitive, or have had unforeseen negative consequences.
  • The controversy must have been notable enough to have impacted the brand's image or led to a change in advertising practices.
  • Campaigns that, intentionally or not, have pushed the boundaries of what is acceptable in advertising, generating discussion about ethics and responsibility, are included.