Other

Intervenciones legales de España en tribunales internacionales

Explore Spain's most prominent legal interventions in international courts, including its participation in crucial cases such as the application of the Genocide Convention in Gaza. This list provides a deep insight into how Spain exerts its legal influence on the global stage, addressing issues of public international law and human rights. Discover Spain's role in interpreting and applying international treaties and conventions, and its stance before the International Court of Justice. An essential resource for understanding Spanish legal diplomacy and its impact on global justice.

0100% verified
  1. 1

    Case VERES v. SPAIN (Application No. 57906/18)

    0 Global Votes

    This case represents a significant legal intervention by Spain in international courts, highlighting the European Court of Human Rights' oversight of the State's obligations. The ECHR's 2022 judgment found Spain responsible for a violation of the right to respect for family life, underscoring the importance of human rights protection at both national and international levels.

  2. 2

    Case of INMOBILIZADOS Y GESTIONES S.L. v. SPAIN (Application no. 79530/17)

    0 Global Votes

    This case represents a significant legal intervention by Spain in an international court, the European Court of Human Rights. The judgment addressed the violation of the right to a fair trial and access to court, highlighting international oversight of Spanish judicial practices. The ECtHR's decision had important implications for Spanish jurisprudence concerning fundamental rights and expropriation proceedings.

  3. 3

    Laguna Guzman v. Spain Case (Application)

    0 Global Votes

    This case is relevant due to Spain's involvement before the European Court of Human Rights, where the use of police force in dispersing a demonstration was examined. The judgment of October 6, 2020, addresses fundamental issues concerning freedom of assembly and the limits of state action in the context of peaceful protests.

  4. 4

    ECHR Condemnation of Spain for Forced Blood Transfusions

    0 Global Votes

    This condemnation by the European Court of Human Rights against Spain is a crucial international legal intervention that reaffirms patients' fundamental right to refuse medical treatment. The ruling sets a significant precedent in European jurisprudence regarding patient autonomy and informed consent, directly impacting medical and legal practices in Spain.

  5. 5

    Refusal to recognize the right to receive a widow's pension (ECtHR)

    0 Global Votes

    This case represents a significant legal intervention by Spain in international courts, specifically the ECtHR, by addressing fundamental issues of social rights and social security. The resolution of such cases contributes to European jurisprudence on equal treatment and the protection of human rights in the context of social benefits.

  6. All the rankings you can imagine

    Thousands of verified votes to discover the best. Your vote here counts

  7. 6

    International Arbitration by Antin Fund against Spain

    0 Global Votes

    This case represents a significant legal intervention by Spain in international tribunals, highlighting the country's defense against investor claims regarding regulatory changes. The 2018 arbitral award, which ordered Spain to pay substantial compensation, underscores the economic and legal implications of government decisions in the realm of international investments.

Frequently asked questions

This ranking evaluates Spain's participation in international courts, including its case history before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and its involvement in proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), as well as its role in international arbitrations.
Users can contribute by sharing relevant information about international judicial cases involving Spain, especially those that have been resolved or are pending in courts such as the ECtHR or ICJ, or in international arbitration processes.
The results should be interpreted as an overview of Spain's international legal activity, highlighting significant cases and trends in its interaction with international courts and arbitration mechanisms. They do not represent an absolute 'winner' or 'loser' rating.
Courts such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), and international arbitration centers that administer disputes with Spanish involvement are considered.

How we built this ranking and what to consider when choosing

The methodology for this ranking focuses on the collection and analysis of Spain's participation in various international legal forums. Our goal is to provide a clear and contextualized view of its most relevant judicial activity.

  • The relevance of cases presented or in which Spain has intervened is considered, such as the Declaration of Intervention before the International Court of Justice.
  • Spain's track record before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) is evaluated, including significant judgments and decisions that have affected Spanish law or practice.
  • Spain's involvement in international arbitrations is analyzed, both domestic with international implications and those administered by relevant arbitration centers.
  • Opinions and context provided by the legal community and case-law databases like HUDOC are considered to ensure a comprehensive perspective.
  • Inclusion of cases before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) where Spain is a party or has intervened.
  • Consideration of Spain's participation in international arbitrations, including those administered by reputable arbitration centers.
  • Relevance of the decision or legal intervention in the field of international law or human rights.
  • Impact of cases on Spain's domestic legislation, policies, or jurisprudence.
  • Availability of public and contextual information regarding the case or legal intervention.