In the ranking
Technology

Comparativa de rendimiento de GPUs integradas

Discover the integrated GPUs (iGPUs) with the best performance in the current market. This comprehensive comparison will help you understand the differences between Intel and AMD models, evaluating their capabilities for gaming and daily applications. We analyze benchmarks and user experiences to provide a clear view of which integrated graphics offer the best balance of power and efficiency. Ideal for those looking for a laptop or desktop computer without a dedicated graphics card.

113100% verified
  1. Intel Arc B580 cover
    1

    Intel Arc B580

    113 Global Votes

    • Generally beats a 4060 for less

      (+4)

    The Intel Arc B580 delivers exceptional 1440p gaming performance, outperforming direct competitors like the Nvidia RTX 4060 and Radeon RX 7600. Its efficiency and support for XeSS 3 provide a smooth and visually impressive gaming experience, solidifying its position in the budget graphics card market.

    More Info
  2. Radeon 8060S cover
    2

    Radeon 8060S

    0 Global Votes

    • Great gaming performance

      (+4)

    The Radeon 8060S delivers exceptional performance for an integrated GPU, often outperforming dedicated cards like the RTX 4060 Mobile in various benchmarks. Its RDNA 3.5 architecture and 40 Compute Units make it a very powerful solution for compact and portable systems, redefining expectations for integrated graphics.

  4. AMD Radeon 780M cover
    3

    AMD Radeon 780M

    0 Global Votes

    • Performs equal to or slightly better than a 1050 Ti

      (+3)

    The AMD Radeon 780M delivers exceptional performance for an integrated GPU, significantly outperforming its direct Intel competitors. It enables smooth gameplay for esports titles at 1080p and many modern games, making it a powerful option for laptops without a dedicated graphics card.

  6. Radeon 8040S cover
    4

    Radeon 8040S

    0 Global Votes

    • Good gaming and benchmark performance

      (+1)

    The Radeon 8040S offers a 29% higher aggregate performance score and a significantly faster GPU clock speed compared to models like the Radeon 890M. Its RDNA 3.5 architecture and support for a newer PCI Express version contribute to its efficiency and ability to handle demanding workloads.

  7. Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU) cover
    5

    Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EU)

    0 Global Votes

    • Supports DirectX 12 for modern games

      (+4)

    The Intel Iris Xe is included in this comparison due to its significant improvement in integrated graphics performance, offering a competent solution for users seeking a balance between power and efficiency. It is capable of handling light tasks and some games at low settings, making it a relevant option within the integrated GPU segment.

Frequently asked questions

This comparison evaluates the performance of integrated GPUs (iGPUs) from different manufacturers like Intel and AMD, based on user benchmark results and their ability to run games and applications.
The results show the relative performance of iGPUs. Higher benchmark values generally indicate a greater ability to handle graphics tasks, although actual in-game performance may vary.
Yes, much of the data in this comparison is based on thousands of user benchmark results. Tools like 3DMark or PassMark G3D Mark can provide metrics that contribute to these comparisons.
Integrated GPUs are built into the CPU and share system memory, whereas dedicated GPUs are separate cards with their own memory, generally offering superior graphics performance.

How we built this ranking and what to consider when choosing

Our methodology for comparing integrated GPU performance is based on collecting and analyzing user benchmark data, as well as considering gaming and general usage experiences. The goal is to provide a clear insight into how these units compare in real-world scenarios.

  • Performance data from popular benchmarks like 3DMark and PassMark G3D Mark, widely used by the community to measure graphics capability, is collected and analyzed.
  • Gaming experience in popular titles is considered, evaluating the playability and frames per second that iGPUs can achieve at different settings.
  • Attention is paid to direct comparisons between rival iGPU models, such as AMD's Radeon series and Intel's Iris Xe or UHD Graphics, highlighting their relative strengths.
  • Information is regularly updated with new community benchmark results to reflect the most current performance of integrated GPUs.
  • Integrated GPUs from leading manufacturers such as AMD (Radeon) and Intel (Iris Xe, UHD Graphics, Arc) are included, as they are the main players in the integrated graphics processor market.
  • Recent and current generation iGPUs are prioritized to ensure the comparison is relevant to modern systems and current performance expectations.
  • iGPUs with a significant volume of user benchmark data are considered, allowing for a more robust and representative evaluation of their performance across various hardware configurations.
  • iGPUs that demonstrate a notable ability to handle graphics tasks beyond basic use, such as light gaming or content editing, are included, highlighting their 'playability' or practical utility.